POLICY EXPRESS · PE-SB-191 · Security Bureau
Combating Scams: From Blocking to Recovery
Deception cases fell in 2025 for the first time since 2019, but online investment fraud is taking a larger share of losses and no one reports money returned.
Free. We only need your email. Unsubscribe at any time.
2 pages · English and 繁體中文 · Built on the 1134211 Framework · Facts as at 25 October 2026
The tension and our thesis
The tension
Hong Kong has become good at blocking calls, links and numbers, yet the scams now costing most are those the victim authorises, and the system measures what it stops, not what it recovers.
Our thesis
Measure recovery, add friction at the point of payment, close the mule and SIM gaps, and consult on shared liability only if recovery stays low.
Three policy problems this brief examines
- 01Losses are moving to authorised payments
- 02Recovery and liability are unmeasured
- 03The elderly and the mule layer pay most
Each problem is developed in three layers: the fact, why it persists, and the consequence for the system.
Three options compared
A · Shared liability: banks and platforms compensate victims.
B · Enforce harder: more blocking, alerts and arrests.
C · Friction at payment: delay and confirm risky transfers, with data sharing.
The scored comparison, the justified recommendation with its phased measures, the implementation challenges, the stakeholder assessment and the success metrics are in the full brief.
Page 1 of this brief is not offered as a free sample.
See what is in the full briefWhat the Sprint Pass opens for this brief
Both pages, in English and Traditional Chinese: the introduction and background, key figures, the three policy problems, the scored options, the recommendation with its phased measures, the implementation challenges, the stakeholder assessment and the conclusion.
How Companions use it
Learn the structure.
Every brief follows the same 1134211 Framework, so you can rehearse the same shape of answer on any topic.
Borrow the facts.
The key figures and the latest developments are laid out so you can cite them with confidence and check them before you do.
Test your own view.
Form your recommendation first, then compare it with ours.
Briefs support your preparation. They do not guarantee any examination or interview result.
Facts and figures are checked against primary sources where we could retrieve them. † marks press-only figures. (J) marks IRB judgements. Facts as at 25 Oct 2026.
Questions
Preparing for 5 December 2026? Get all 186 briefs with the Sprint Pass.
See the Sprint PassIron Rice Bowl is an independent coaching provider. It is not part of, endorsed by or affiliated with the Hong Kong SAR Government. Briefs are study aids; facts are as at the date shown and should be checked against the latest official source before use.





